Hot topics

Nothing Ear (2) Review: Carl Pei has Heard (and Listened)!

NextPit Nothing Ear 2 Test
© nextpit

Read in other languages:

Carl Pei, the young and hip CEO of Nothing, which is also a young and hip tech startup, just launched the Nothing Ear (2), a pair of wireless earphones for young and hip people. I'm not young and hip anymore, but I reviewed the Nothing Ear (2) and I'll tell you why they convinced me.

Nothing Ear (2)

Good

  • Design identical to Ear (1) but still very cool
  • Completely reworked hardware
  • Hi-Res certified, LHDC codec
  • Dual Bluetooth 5.3 pairing
  • Very complete Nothing X application (Android & iOS)
  • Qi Wireless Charging

Bad

  • Average battery life
  • Unchanged design from the Nothing Ear (1)
  • Inefficient microphones outdoors
Nothing Ear (2)
Nothing Ear (2)
Nothing Ear (2): All deals

The Nothing Ear (2) in a nutshell

The Nothing Ear (2) was unveiled on March 21, 2023, with an asking price of $149. This is $50 more than when the Nothing Ear (1) debuted last year. However, it is no longer the case since the Nothing Ear (1) NextPit reviewed last year saw its price shoot up from $99 to $149 after the release of Nothing ear (stick) at a little less premium price point of $99.

In short, I would like to say that Nothing has moved upmarket but not only in terms of price. Carl Pei, with his OnePlus heritage, knows that listening to his community is not so bad at times. This year, the Nothing Ear (2) silenced many of the criticisms I had about their predecessors.

It retains this cool transparent plastic look but we have a brand-new HD codec, Hi-Res certification, ANC, and an equalizer that is specially adapted to your hearing while retaining its fast charging quality. A hell of a combo for less than $150, which is half the price of the AirPods Pro 2.

Design

When it comes to its design, almost nothing has changed on the Nothing Ear (2). The earbuds have exactly the same look, with an in-ear format that looks like a mini hair dryer, and its famous transparent plastic exterior. The case is a little more compact and thicker, but that's about it.


Pros:

  • IP54 for the earbuds, IP55 for the case.
  • Port sensor.
  • Compact case.
  • Correct and comfortable support when worn.

Cons:

  • A not-so-unique look (hair dryer form factor like all the rest).

The stems of the Nothing ear (2) have a haptic surface for controls.
The stems of the Nothing Ear (2) have a haptic surface for controls. / © NextPit

I wanted to talk about the design of the Nothing Ear (2) last, but I didn't want to upset your reading habit, so we'll do it quickly.

Visually, the design of the earbuds is exactly the same as the Nothing Ear (1) from last year. The actual changes happened inside, and I'll talk about them in the "audio quality" section.

The case of the Nothing ear (2) is IP55 certified, the headphones IP54
The case of the Nothing Ear (2) is IP55 certified, the headphones IP54. / © NextPit

They are both IP54 certified for water and dust resistance. The case itself is IP55 certified. In other words, you can consider them for sports use as long as you don't go to the pool.

The fit in my ears proved to be more than decent. They don't pop out when I am chewing and overall, I didn't need to constantly readjust them frequently. The wearing comfort is also very good, if you can stand the in-ear form factor.

When we take a look at both stems, we end up with capacitive keys, just like what you will find on the Airpods Pro. You will have to press the stem once, twice, or three times to activate a particular command. It avoids any false detection and worked pretty well throughout the time I spent with it. In these stems, Nothing explained that they have reversed the position of the antennas (which used to point downwards and are now pointing upwards). This is supposed to prevent your little cheeks from blocking the signal during calls.

The Nothing Ear (2) are intras headphones but I do not find them too invasive in the ear.
The Nothing Ear (2) are in-ear headphones but I do not find them too invasive in the ear. / © NextPit

Well, it's clearly not a revolution in design. I still found the transparent look of the Nothing Ear (2) to be cool. The case looks solid even if the transparent plastic will inevitably get tarnished and scratched when it is in your pockets.

Audio quality and microphones

The real changes are found inside the Nothing Ear (2). They are Hi-Res certified, unlike the previous model. We finally have an HD audio codec with the LHDC in addition to the basic SBC and AAC standards and we have a new system of double drivers that measure 11.6 mm. The improvements are really noticeable compared to the previous model.


Pros:

  • LHDC audio codec.
  • Two 11.6 mm drivers.
  • Hi-Res certified.
  • Much more faithful audio signature in the midrange and treble.

Cons:

  • Profile is a little too low by default.

Nothing has integrated two new 11.6mm speakers into each earbud
Nothing has integrated two new 11.6mm speakers into each earbud. / © NextPit

Dual drivers and LHDC codec

We will begin with this system of double drivers that measure 11.6 mm. They are composed of a mixture of graphene and polyurethane and are supposed to improve the quality from one end to the other end of the frequency range.

In front of and behind the two diaphragms (diaphragms, drivers, loudspeakers—they are all the same thing), we have two "chambers" of air or airlocks. These chambers allow one to limit the echo for an audio signal to be more faithful to the source. It also allows better spatialization, at least in theory.

All this, according to Nothing, has allowed the Nothing Ear (2) to be certified Hi-Res. Basically, this means that the earbuds are capable of reproducing 24 Bit/192 kHz at 1Mbps. But all this is useless if you don't have an HD audio codec playing through these earbuds.

And, unlike the Nothing ear (1), the Nothing Ear (2) supports the LHDC codec in addition to the basic (and mandatory) SBC and AAC. Technically, and if you have a compatible source (smartphone, tablet, etc), you can enjoy bitrates up to 900 kbps with a 24-bit depth and 96 kHz sampling rate.

So if you have a subscription to Tidal or other similar music streaming services, or you have CD-quality audio files locally, you can listen to them in a far better manner. If you're listening to MP3s or Spotify, it won't make much of a difference in your life.

Nothing has totally reworked the hardware inside the ear (2)
Nothing has totally reworked the hardware inside the Ear (2). / © NextPit

Big improvements in audio quality

Personally, I think Nothing has made big improvements in the audio quality. Bass is still a bit boosted by default, but you can adjust that via the EQ.

The midrange is much more accurate, and that's important because that's where you find the essence of the musical stage, voices, instruments, etc. Above all, the highs are less harsh than before. This is especially stark as the highs are less pronounced than on the Nothing Ear (1). Not only that, it is so much better, and we do not have any more these worries of sibilance, with the sounds in "S", "F" or "Sh" which whistle and make the eardrums creak.

The equalizer in the Nothing X app is a bit funky
The equalizer in the Nothing X app is a bit funky. / © NextPit

An equalizer specially adapted to your hearing

On the Nothing Ear (2), there is an equalizer in the Nothing X application. Basically, you can test your ears and see how well you can hear from one end of the frequency range to the other, i.e. low-medium-high. The application shows you how much detail you hear, and how much detail the equalizer had to compensate for.

Nothing is not the only one to offer this. I found the way of presenting the results very interesting. You get a better understanding of how you perceive music and how much the equalization impacts the user experience.

The equalizer of the Nothing ear (2) is a little weird but we get used to it quickly
The equalizer of the Nothing Ear (2) is a little weird but we get used to it quickly. / © NextPit

A quick point about the quality of the microphones. I found it to be very average, as on almost all the wireless earbuds I have reviewed. When indoors, it passes the test. When one is outdoors, it's barely better or even worse than with the smartphone's microphone. I will let you judge by yourself with these short extracts recorded with the Nothing Ear (2) on my Nothing Phone (1).


Interior - quiet


Indoor - with background noise


Outdoors

Active Noise Reduction (ANC)

The Nothing Ear (2) offers active noise reduction, or ANC in short. We can reduce ambient noise up to 40 decibels according to the manufacturer. We also have a transparency mode. Once again, Nothing has made great progress and these different modes affect the audio quality much less than before.


Pros:

  • Good attenuation of structure-borne noise.
  • Adaptive ANC doesn't sound too temperamental and adjustments are made smoothly.
  • Good passive isolation (without ANC).
  • Manual adjustment of the ANC is possible.

Cons:

  • Human voices are not sufficiently attenuated, especially with adaptive ANC.

Nothing reversed the positioning of the antennas in the stems of the Nothing ear (2) for more stable connectivity
Nothing reversed the positioning of the antennas in the stems of the Nothing Ear (2) for more stable connectivity. / © NextPit

The active noise reduction (ANC) of the Nothing Ear (2) is adaptive and uses three microphones in each earpiece. You can test it in a noisy environment and the Active Noise Reduction will automatically adjust to the surrounding fluctuations.

You can also opt for a manual setting and choose from three levels of intensity. For my part, I preferred the ANC in manual mode and always left it on the highest notch. In adaptive mode, I found that the voices of people around me were not filtered enough.

Solid-borne noise (noise produced by contact between two surfaces) was well attenuated in both cases, and most importantly, the sound quality, or rather the sound signature, was not too much affected by the activation of the ANC. Basically, the difference between what you hear with and without ANC is not as pronounced as with the previous model.

I don't have any frequency response measurement tools at my disposal. I would like to invite you to go and see the DMS video which has done some very good analysis comparing the audio rendering with or without ANC and with or without transparency mode, with curves to support it.

Active noise cancellation can be adaptive or manually set to three intensity
Active noise cancellation can be adaptive or manually set to three intensity levels. / © NextPit

Features and connectivity

We'll quickly go over the Nothing X companion app. It is available on both Android and iOS. Yes, even Apple fans who are apostles of the Holy Tim Cook can use it on their iPhone 14 Pro Max! Ditto if you have an equally overpriced Galaxy S23 Ultra.


Pros:

  • Nothing X application is available on Android and iOS.
  • Wholesome user interface.
  • Dual pairing via Bluetooth 5.3.

Cons:

  • Some occasional stability issues.

The Nothing X app is very complete and available on Android and iOS
The Nothing X app is very complete and available on Android and iOS. / © NextPit

In the Nothing X application, you can adjust the intensity of the ANC, activate the transparency mode, manage Nothing's slightly weird equalizer, and assign the haptic controls.

The Nothing Ear (2) also has a port detector, dual Bluetooth pairing to connect 2 devices at the same time via Bluetooth 5.3. There is also a function to locate your earbuds when you lose them.

Nothing X also offers various tests, including the one that I mentioned above. You can test your hearing to adjust the equalizer and you can also test if your earbuds are correctly inserted in your ear canal.

The Nothing X application is very complete and its interface very neat
The Nothing X application is very complete and its interface is very neat. / © NextPit

In short, I found the application to be very complete. The interface is visually cool while the equalizer can be a bit weird to grasp at first. Apart from that everything is ok.

Pairing is very easy with Google Fast Pair (and Microsoft Swift Pair for PCs). The dual pairing works well even if I found that the Nothing Ear (2) took a little too long to switch from one device to the other.

I also had some connectivity problems on Google Meet via my PC. Voices sometimes sounded a bit robotic for a few seconds. Maybe it was my connection, I don't know. I was also using a beta version of the firmware, so that is worth mentioning. Perhaps the final release version will work better.

Haptic controls of Nothing Ear (2) can be easily reassigned.
Haptic controls of Nothing Ear (2) can be easily reassigned. / © NextPit

Autonomy and recharging

Nothing guarantees a total of 36 hours of battery life, including recharging it via the case. On a single charge, the earbuds themselves can last up to 6.3 hours according to the manufacturer. We can also wireless charge (Qi) it at 2.5 watts.


Pros:

  • Up to 5 recharges via the case.
  • Wireless charging using standard Qi adapters.
  • USB-C cable provided.

What I disliked:

  • 4 hours with ANC, 6 hours without.

The box of the Nothing ear (2) is slightly more compact than the previous model
The box of the Nothing Ear (2) is slightly more compact than the previous model. / © NextPit

Without ANC, the earbuds last up to 6.3 hours on a single charge. With ANC, that drops to 4 hours. Obviously, if you make calls, the overall battery life drops a bit more.

Overall, I found the battery life of the Nothing Ear (2) to be rather average compared to what is done on the market. Four hours with ANC enabled, which is rather little for me especially because I constantly left the active noise reduction activated.

On the other hand, the battery of the case is more solid than many of its competitors. You can perform up to five full recharges of the earbuds via the case before you have to recharge it too (via the included USB-C cable).

In comparison, the Soundcore Liberty 4 can only be recharged twice in the case. They also have a battery life of seven hours with ANC and nine hours without.

When it comes to charging, you can do that on a wireline basis via USB-C. Ten minutes of charging gives back the equivalent of eight hours of listening time without ANC. We also have the Qi wireless charging in 2.5 watts which is always a pleasure in this price range.

2.5-watt wireless charging is available on the Nothing Ear (2)
2.5-watt wireless charging is available on the Nothing Ear (2). / © NextPit

Conclusion

So, is the Nothing Ear (2) a yay or nay? Personally, I strongly recommend it. I won't compare them to the AirPods Pro 2 because I haven't reviewed them yet and because they are twice as expensive.

But the Nothing Ear (2) corrected almost all the defects of the Ear (1). I criticized the Nothing Ear (1) for being just cool in appearance but too basic in terms of technical specifications and audio quality.

This is not the case anymore, or at least, it is much less the case with the Nothing Ear (2). For less than $150, you get an HD codec, wireless charging, adaptive noise reduction, and a maximum battery life of 6 hours per earbud.

It's not that much to pay to spice up your ears with true wireless earphones that are clearly more stylish than the countless white hairdryers we're used to seeing in this price range.

What about you? What do you think about Nothing Ear (2)? Whether you're using an iPhone or Android phone, would you consider them in your daily life?

The best smartphones under $1,000 

  Editor's recommendation The best iPhone The best camera phone Value for money The best foldable The most affordable
Product
Price
  • $799
  • $799
  • $999
  • $599
  • $999
  • $499
Picture Samsung Galaxy S24 Product Image Apple iPhone 15 Product Image Google Pixel 8 Pro Product Image Nothing Phone (2) Product Image Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Product Image Google Pixel 7a Product Image
Review
Review: Samsung Galaxy S24
Review: Apple iPhone 15
Review: Google Pixel 8 Pro
Review: Nothing Phone (2)
Review: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
Review: Google Pixel 7a
Offer*
nextpit receives a commission for purchases made via the marked links. This has no influence on the editorial content and there are no costs for you. You can find out more about how we make money on our transparency page.
Go to comment (0)
Antoine Engels

Antoine Engels
Senior Editor

Black belt in specs sheet analysis. OnePlus fanboy in (slow) remission. Average estimated reading time of my articles: 48 minutes. Tech deals fact-checker in my spare time. Hates talking about himself in the 3rd person. Dreams he was a gaming journalist in another life. Doesn't get the concept of irony. Head of editorial for NextPit France.

View all articles
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
No comments
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing