The death of the headphone jack is good...for business

The death of the headphone jack is good...for business

No sooner had smartphone manufacturers removed the good ol’ headphone port, a whole assortment of new accessories appeared on the market: Both accessory manufacturers and smartphone manufacturers themselves benefit from this self-imposed move with adapter dongles, headsets and pricey headphones with or without an integrated D/A converter. Here are some examples.

Lenovo, Apple, HTC, Xiaomi and now Google as well with the Pixel 2: Premium smartphones are dropping support for the analog 3.5-mm headphone port and enclose adapter dongles with the devices for the transitional phase. However, it’s clear what it’s all really about, especially when you look at the prices of new headsets and the replacement adapters.

Arguments in favor of eliminating the headphone port only slightly differ among manufacturers, which you can tell from the amount of nonsensical hogwash it contains. Google has been quoted as saying, “a better digital audio experience while we move toward a future without display bezels” and other manufacturers also point out the slimmer device bodies.

From a manufacturer’s point of view, doing away with the headphone port can actually be beneficial, because if the manufacturer also removes the digital-to-analog converter (DAC), they can also save on an expensive electronic component in addition to the pretty large jack. However, since many Type-C connections can also output analog audio signals, this argument falls flat on its face in some cases.

AndroidPIT elephone p9000 1164
Eliminating the headphone jack gives the Type-C port bad publicity. / © NextPit

Not only are we trapped into buying new accessories as a customer, we don’t even receive clarification on whether it will work. Just because it is a Type-C dongle, doesn't mean it will work either, seeing as there is a specific specification for audio hardware: USB Audio Device Class 3.0 (ADC) ensures that third-party dongles are guaranteed to work with the appropriate Type-C ports. However, you always need to take a close look at the tech specs tables when considering a dongle or even ask whether HTC, Google, etc. have also worked to comply with this standard. If they haven't, then you are dependent on the original dongle which, in the case of the Pixel 2, costs twice as much as Apple’s awkward counterpart.

Now this is where things get interesting: Will manufacturers comply with the Type-C standard and let us use low-cost third-party accessories? Or will even more marketing be used to create new walled gardens with labels such as “Made for Google”?

It’s currently unclear why this label even exists in the first place. Google uses “digital audio” transmission, which would theoretically be compatible with most Type-C audio accessories. Nevertheless, tested headsets are given an additional seal of approval that is good for sales, but when you look closely is in fact meaningless, which the company further praises in a forum post.

All this changes nothing. If anything, it even ensures that these unnecessary accessories will be mercilessly overpriced. The Type-C-to-Type C-and-jack Moshi adapter costs an outstanding $45 and solves the newly created problem of not being able to charge your Pixel 2 when listening to music with a wired headset.

It’s OK to discontinue and replace an outdated standard such as the 3.5-mm jack, but as things look now, it completely ignores the interests of the customer. We are not told what accessories we can use now, the dongles are annoying, not well-made and their prices are highway robbery. Thanks for nothing, smartphone industry.

What do you think about of the headphone jack in many of today's top smartphones? Is it something that grinds your gears or are you down with it? Let us know in the comments below.

NextPit receives a commission for purchases made via the marked links. This has no influence on the editorial content and there are no costs for you. You can find out more about how we make money on our transparency page.
Liked this article? Share now!
Join the discussion


Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • Dean L. Oct 13, 2017 Link to comment

    The sound quality from a wired connection is still better and doesn't drain the phone battery either. I also use a Bluetooth headset and speakers but at the cost of needing all of the devices charged for use. Which sometimes isn't convenient. So I prefer a wired connection through the standard headphone Jack.

  • David Martrano Oct 13, 2017 Link to comment

    For myself, I refuse to purchase a phone without a headphone jack. I choose Samsung phones because they always include one!

  • storm Oct 12, 2017 Link to comment

    It's all about the ports. This is one of the problems Apple's devices Beyond phones have.

    They lack the ports to support multiple simultaneous connections. Trying to push it off on the Bluetooth or Wifi or LTE doesn't solve the problem. Those standards are insecure enough and have power drain issues for heavy use.

    The Aesthetics of no ports should not be the driving factor nor the simplification that offers in waterproof or dust proofing. Function should dictate Form and function dictates multiple simultaneous connections in multiple ports.

    It's all good if it's all USBC or if they want to use USB headphone or something. Just give me enough ports to do the job and that's more than one.

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing