Hot topics

Google integrates Fact Check label in image search to fight fake news

google mobile first indexing
© google

Read in other languages:

In its fight against the spread of misinformation, Google will put 'Fact Check' labels on certain search results in Google Images to pinpoint misleading photos or photos of dubious origin.

"Photos and videos are an incredible way to help people understand what’s going on in the world. But the power of visual media has its pitfalls⁠—especially when there are questions surrounding the origin, authenticity or context of an image," Google wrote in a blog post detailing the device on Monday, June 22.

Thus, this Fact Check function in Google Images is based on the same algorithms used for fact-checking in Google Search and Google News search results, as Mountain View explains.

Concretely, the search giant will put a label in the thumbnail of an image in Google Images (just after the caption of the image). When you click on the image concerned to enlarge it, a summary will be displayed below with the fake news that the image wants to propagate and the patch or explanation provided.

Fact-checking by "independent and reliable sources"...

By having its Fact Check label, Google will not itself fact-check misleading photos. It will "simply" (it's not that simple) use an algorithm that will draw from sources that Google considers to be reliable.

Mountain View explains that only "independent and reliable sources meeting our criteria" will be used. These sources are based on ClaimReview, a method used by publishers to indicate their fact-checking content to search engines.

In its very simplistic example with the image of a shark falsely claiming to be swimming in downtown Houston, the Fact Check works without a hitch. But let's think about more complex cases, such as the image of a protester beaten by police officers or a police officer lynched by protesters.

It is common for these images to be subsequently taken out of context several years after being captured. The aim is to tip the balance of public opinion in favor of one side or the other of social conflict. While the idea that a shark is swimming in the city creates a basic juxtaposition that leads us to question this image, the confirmation bias that a photo of a lynching in the middle of a demonstration creates is much more complex.

So we'll just have to see how reliable this algorithm is. Google announced that it would be available immediately.

Source: Google Blog

Best smartphones to buy in 2024

  The best Android phone The best iPhone Best camera phone Best mid-range 2023 Best Foldable Best compact foldable
Image Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Product Image Apple iPhone 15 Pro Product Image Google Pixel 8 Pro Product Image Google Pixel 7a Product Image OnePlus Open product image Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Product Image
Review: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Review: Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Review: Google Pixel 8 Pro
Review: Google Pixel 7a
Review: OnePlus Open
Review: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
Go to comment (3)
Antoine Engels

Antoine Engels
Senior Editor

Black belt in specs sheet analysis. OnePlus fanboy in (slow) remission. Average estimated reading time of my articles: 48 minutes. Tech deals fact-checker in my spare time. Hates talking about himself in the 3rd person. Dreams he was a gaming journalist in another life. Doesn't get the concept of irony. Head of editorial for NextPit France.

To the author profile
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • jelabarre59 3
    jelabarre59 Jul 22, 2020 Link to comment

    "an algorithm that will draw from sources that Google considers to be reliable"

    Ah, so in other words, sources that fit with Google's own political & social agenda. Thanks for warning us ahead of time.

  • 3
    Serress Jun 28, 2020 Link to comment

    As long as they do not censor content, they can label, for what it's worth.

    But most people are not that stupid and can make judgments about veracity, so I see this as mostly meaningless pandering to the zealots of all stripes clamoring for censorship.

  • marco sarli 39
    marco sarli
    • Admin
    Jun 24, 2020 Link to comment

    Nothing can beat human judgment and the use of a bit of common sense

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing