Hot topics

Trump blacklists Xiaomi for alleged ties with Chinese military

xiaomi logo 1
© nextpit

Read in other languages:

Updated with Xiaomi statement. Original article follows.

The Trump administration, even as it is going out of power next week, has added nine Chinese companies - including Xiaomi - to a list that allegedly has ties to the Chinese military. These companies shall be subject to several restrictions with the most significant one being losing the ability to raise funds from American investors.

At the outset, let us make it clear that Xiaomi is not in the same list as Huawei. The latter, as you are already aware, is subject to harsher restrictions and is barred from collaborating with American companies. Xiaomi, on the other hand, can continue using/buying American-sourced technology and components on their products and, possibly, even sell their products in the U.S. 

What they cannot do anymore, however, is raise money from US investors. Another distinction between the two ‘bans’ is that while Huawei’s ban was issued by the US Commerce Department, the newest Xiaomi ban comes from the US Defense Department.

While this will lead to Xiaomi losing some immediate capital, it is not expected to affect their supply chain or even their business in the long term. The company isn’t too dependent on the US market and has at the best, negligible, presence in the U.S and North America. 

The blacklist that Xiaomi finds itself in has been around since 1999. It gained prominence only after Trump issued an executive order in November 2020 which barred US investors from investing in companies found to be in this list. What is also notable is the fact that any current investments in these firms by American firms or individuals will need to be divested by November 11, 2021. This also means that Qualcomm Ventures who has invested in Xiaomi will need to divest its holdings in the Chinese company before the said deadline. 

Unlike the case with Huawei, the ‘ban’ on Xiaomi will have little to no effect on their consumers. The company will continue making smartphones and consumer electronics goods and sell them anywhere in the world. On the business side, though, it remains to be seen how much of an effect it would have when Xiaomi loses access to funding and investments from US-based individuals and companies. It also remains to be seen if these bans will remain in place once the Biden administration takes over next week.
 

Source: CNN Business

Comparison: The best foldable phones

  Best large foldable Best clamshell flip Best foldable alternative Best passport foldable Best flip alternative Price pick
Product
Image OnePlus Open product image Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Product Image Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Product Image Google Pixel Fold Product Image Motorola Razr+ (2023) Product Image Motorola Razr (2023) Product Image
Rating
Rating: OnePlus Open
Rating: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
Rating: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
Rating: Google Pixel Fold
Rating: Motorola Razr+ (2023)
Rating: Motorola Razr (2023)
Price Comparison
Go to comment (1)
Rahul Srinivas

Rahul Srinivas
Senior Editor

Among the most experienced tech journalists from India, Rahul has spent the better part of the past decade writing and experiencing technology. In his decade-long career, Rahul has contributed to several Indian and International publications, including Mobilegeeks, Onlygizmos, iPhoneHacks, and The Inquisitr. Before joining NextPit, he held the position of Senior Editor at MySmartPrice - one of India's largest product research platforms.

View all articles
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
1 Comment
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • 49
    storm Jan 15, 2021 Link to comment

    China's economic model does raise concerns for those interested in security and privacy on devices.

    Even the trend in TVs to have microphones and cameras regardless of maker or location of manufacture is pretty darn creepy in its own right. I might get a software toggle to make me feel good about switching it off, but who knows if it was really switched off. We need open software standards so we can investigate these devices and actually know what we're buying.

    Rahul Srinivas