Hot topics

LG G Watch vs Samsung Gear Live: which should I buy?

lg g watch samsung gear live
© LG, Samsung, nextpit

Though the average person may not know what this so-called Google I/O event is, what comes out off it is what really matters for the general public, rather than talking about the actual event itself and Android development for that matter. Two new smartwatches were launched yesterday and are already available in the Google Play Store: the LG G Watch and the Samsung Gear Live. In trying to decide which wearable to buy, here are more concrete details about the smartwatches to ease your decision.

lg g watch samsung gear live
© LG, Samsung, AndroidPIT


Both smartwatches use the newly announced Android Wear operating system designed for wearables. There are very minimal differences between the two square-faced watches, and design is one of the main points where they’ve taken two different roads. For one, the Gear Live from Samsung has a silver frame around the display, making it seem a little more high end than the G Watch, which has more of a sporty armband look with remnants of the G Shock model from Casio.

samsung gear live
Samsung's Gear Live, the ''chic'' one of the two, runs Android Wear and is compatible with non-Samsung smartphones too. / © Samsung


Like mentioned above, both use Android Wear, which is the new OS for wearables from Google. It connects seamlessly with your smartphone, and brings the information to you faster than taking a phone out of your pocket or purse. Some things it can do is guide you to your destination step-by-step with Google Maps, buzz when you have a notification, accept voice commands with Google Now, which can also answer your question when wanting to know something, like the forecast, or to set a timer for a potroast in the oven. It also helps you get fit in cooperating with Google Fit, counts steps etc. These are just some of the features, the extensity of which you can read on the Android Wear website.


On the technical side though, the Gear Live does offer a heart-rate monitor, and it employes AMOLED technology for its display. The G Watch on the other hand makes use of LCD technology, and employs an IPS panel. Both watches though are water and dust resistant (IP67) and will allegedly run with all Android smartphones that run Android 4.3 or later. Even the Samsung Gear Live, which at first was presumed to work just with Samsung smartphones, a nice thing they learned since the flop of the first Galaxy Gear.

lg g watch
The G Watch is the more sporty wearable that runs Android Wear and is waterproof./ © LG

Tech Specs compared

  LG G Watch Samsung Gear Live
System Android Wear Android Wear
Display 1.65-inch, 280 x 280 pixels, IPS LCD, 247 ppi 1.63-inch, 320 x 320 pixels, Super AMOLED, 278 ppi
Dimensions 37.9 x 46.5 x 9.95 mm 37.9 x 56.4 x 8.9 mm
Weight 63 g 59 g
Battery 400 mAh 300 mAh
Processor 1.2 GHz 1.2 GHz
RAM 512 MB 512 MB
Internal storage 4 GB 4 GB
Connectivity Bluetooth 4.0 LE, USB (Pogo-Pin) on G Watch, Micro USB on Charging Cradle Bluetooth 4.0 LE, USB (Pogo-Pin)
Sensors 9 Axis (Accelerometer/Compass/Gyro) Accelerometer, Digital compass, Gyroscope, Heart rate monitor
Other IP67 water and dust resistant. IP67 water and dust resistant.
Compatibility Android smartphones starting at Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android smartphones starting at  Android 4.3 Jelly Bean
Price  229 USD (Google Play) 199 USD (Google Play)

LCD vs AMOLED vs battery consumption & outdoor usage

It has come to the point now where users really have a lot of choice on their hands: both watches are almost identical, so the thing which will really make a difference here is the style. On the one hand though, many say that an AMOLED display is better on the battery than an LCD display, but this has to do with smartphones, however I can imagine it would be the same scenario with smartwatches. The LG G Watch has a capacity of 400 mAh while the Gear Live has 300 mAh, but the reputed more energy-efficient AMOLED panel on the Gear Live should even out the gap in battery life, so both will likely come out the same. There is a whole bunch of things to consider when comparing LCD vs AMOLED which could apply here, but for the average user there will likely not be a difference. On the Play Store, they advertise both to last one day on a single charge.

Also, we’ve previously tested to see which screen technology, LCD or AMOLED, is better for viewing in the outdoors, and LCD was deemed better due to its backlighting. This will, however, need to be tested when we get both smartwatches, which incidentally will be very soon as soon as our rep returns from San Francisco, so stay tuned for a more thorough test of both.

Both watches cost almost the same, as reflected above in the table, but if neither one of them is really doing it for you, the Motorola Moto 360, also running Android Wear, but with a nice classic band and a round face, could be more your thing. We'll be getting that soon enough too, so stay tuned for a full comparison.

From what you know so far, which smartwatch would you consider buying?

Which smartwatch would you buy?
View results

Top Samsung Galaxy Watches: Choosing Your Best Fit

  2023 models 2023 models 2022 models 2022 models 2021 models 2021 models
Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Product Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic Product Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Product Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro Product Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Product Image Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic Product Image
Review: Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
Not yet tested
Not yet tested
Review: Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro
Review: Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
Not yet tested
Go to comment (11)
Loie Favre

Loie Favre

Loie Favre found her way to her present passion for Android and smartphone technology after experiencing an epiphany when she held her Galaxy Note 2. From that point onwards, you can find her with her nose buried in countless Android apps and different smartphone models, and thanking her lucky stars that she gets to work at something she loves.

View all articles
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • 2
    Maha Noor Jun 28, 2014 Link to comment

    both looks fine but main difference is price i think

  • Bojan M. 23
    Bojan M. Jun 27, 2014 Link to comment

    Both are ugly and Motorola one not far from them too, although that one looks better.

  • Jay Chew 4
    Jay Chew Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

    anyone knows what kind of glass used on these watches?

  • 1
    paul Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

    too expensiv for a watch

  • 4
    dharr18 Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

    My deciding factor is seeing them in person. Until they are available in a brick and mortar location, I am holding off on my judgement. Some pictures make these things look massive, others make them seem manageable. After seeing the original Samsung Gear in person, the thickness turned me off.

    • Loie Favre 33
      Loie Favre Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

      You've hit the nail on the head. It's really hard to tell which is better, and since it really depends on taste for the most part, it would be best to see each in person. I already like the Moto 360 by the look the best, and would choose the Gear Live as a second choice.

  • 4
    dharr18 Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

    The price on the Samsung should be $199.

    • Loie Favre 33
      Loie Favre Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

      You are right! Sorry about that. It has been fixed.

      • 4
        dharr18 Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

        No problem, I have a tendency to pick up on the little stuff like that. :D

        Loie Favre

  • Henry B. 10
    Henry B. Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

    Neither, wait for a round faced one to be released, they look way better.

    • Loie Favre 33
      Loie Favre Jun 26, 2014 Link to comment

      It does look really snazzy!

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing