Hot topics

Galaxy A52 vs Galaxy A72: Samsung's mid-range smartphones compared

NextPit Samgung Galaxy A72 display
© nextpit

Read in other languages:

Samsung presented its new mid-range smartphones to us in March this year. Besides the A32 and the A52 without 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G and the Galaxy A72 were the two most important devices out of the lot. We took a look at the latter two for this smartphone comparison to help those who are still on the fence.

When Samsung lifted the curtain in March this year and finally unveiled its new mid-range after the flagship models spearheaded by the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra in January, there were four different models to marvel at: the Galaxy A32, the Galaxy A52, the Galaxy A52 5G and finally, the Galaxy A72.

samsung galaxy a32 a52 a72 family photo 2ct
This is Samsung's new mid-range lineup / © Samsung

We picked out the two most promising models for our smartphone comparison with the Galaxy A72, which nominally leads the Samsung mid-range handset pack and the Galaxy A52 5G. We have already reviewed both smartphones where you can check them out after the specifications comparison segment.

Galaxy A52 5G vs. Galaxy A72: Hardware specifications compared

Before we get down to the nitty-gritty, we'll first take a quick look at the cold, hard facts of the two mid-range models from the South Korean conglomerate. Here, you'll find a summary of the most important hardware specifications of Samsung's new mid-range.
Model Galaxy A52 5G Galaxy A72
8 nm octa-core processor (2 x 2.2 Ghz + 6 x 1.8 GHz)
8 nm Octa-Core processor (2 x 2.3 Ghz + 6 x 1.8 GHz)
Memory (RAM / internal) 6 or 8 GB / 128 or 256 GB

6 GB / 128 GB

Expandable memory Yes, MicroSD up to 1 TB Yes, MicroSD up to 1 TB
Display 6.5-inch, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 120 Hz 6.7-inch, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 90 Hz
Size 75.1 x 159.9 x 8.4 mm 77.4 x 165 x 8.4 mm
Weight approx. 189 gram 205 grams
Connectivity 5G, WIFi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC LTE, WIFi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC
  • Main: 64 MP with f/1.8 and OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12 MP with f/2.2
  • Depth: 5 MP with f/2.4
  • Macro: 5 MP with f/2.4
  • Main: 64 MP with f/1.8 and OIS
  • Ultra-wide: 12 MP with f/2.2
  • Telephoto (3x): 8 MP with f/2.4
  • Macro: 5 MP with f/2.4
Front camera 32 MP without AF 32 MP without AF
Battery capacity 4,500 mAh 5,000 mAh
Charging technologies 25 Watts Quick Charging 25 Watts Quick Charging
IP Certification IP 67 IP 67
  • Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
  • Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
Operating System Android 11 with 4 years of security updates Android 11 with 4 years of security updates
  • Awesome Violet
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Violet
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
Price $429 / $489 $449
Test report Galaxy A52 5G review Galaxy A72 review

Two smartphones with a lot of similarities...

Unsurprisingly, the new A-class smartphones are very similar in appearance. All in all, we're dealing with a rather unspectacular form factor. Samsung has ensured that the build quality of both devices is top-notch, as usual. Both models are also similar in size: While the A52 comes with a 6.5-inch display, the A72 is a wee bit larger, arriving with a 6.7-inch display.

In addition, both models are IP67 certified, boast stereo speakers as well as Dolby Atmos support, and a 3.5 mm headphone jack. Another similarity that makes it all the more difficult to choose between the two: Android 11 with guaranteed security updates for up to four years, operating system updates for up to three years, and a memory card slot for expandable memory.

samsung galaxy a52 colors 2ct
Both the A52 and the A72 are available in four colors / © Samsung

... but there are also differences!

Naturally, it's not just the display size that sets them apart here. While the A52 is powered by a Snapdragon 750G SoC, the A72 is equipped with the Snapdragon 720G, which also lacks 5G functionality. Missing 5G support is the more decisive difference here because when it comes to performance, it is pretty hard to tell between the two.

Personally, I have always found benchmark tests to be meaningless. To get a better idea of the performance gap between the two (if any), check out the table below.

Samsung Galaxy A72 vs A52 5G: Benchmark results

Benchmark Geekbench 5 CPU Geekbench 5 Computing 3D Mark Wildlife 3D Mark Wild Life Stress Test
Galaxy A72 548/1616 1.220 1.048 at 6,3 FPS Highest score: 1.044
Lowest score: 1.040
Galaxy A52 5G 620/1740 1.312 1,090 at 6.5 FPS Highest score: 1,093
Lowest score: 1.090

There is also a difference in the available (working) memory: While the A72 will only come in 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal memory configuration, the A52 5G comes with an optional 8 GB RAM and 256 GB memory configuration. Thus, the A52 is slightly ahead at this point, but only by such a small margin that it should not be ultimately decisive in this comparison.

The camera separates the wheat from the chaff

The difference is probably clearer when it comes down to the camera, although both devices compete with a quad-cam setup where three of the four cameras are identical. In addition to the main 48 MP shooter, there's the 12 MP ultra-wide-angle cam and the 5 MP macro camera. Good news: compared to the very popular mid-range smartphone A51 from last year, Samsung has included optical image stabilization for the main camera in their new mid-range handsets.

NextPit Samgung Galaxy A72 camera
The camera arrays look identical but the A72 offers more here / © NextPit

So that leaves us with just one of four shooters to make the difference between the two handsets, and unsurprisingly, this is exactly what happens. The A72 has a 3x telephoto sensor at 8 MP resolution, while Samsung 'cheats' by throwing in a 5 MP shooter with a depth sensor into the A52 5G. In my opinion, the A72 scores better here, so that those who love mobile photography would be better off with the larger sibling.

The selfie cams are identical on both devices with 32 MP resolution, but unfortunately, both also do not come with autofocus.

Two beautiful Super AMOLED displays, but ...

Let's now talk about the display: In both cases, Samsung offers us Super AMOLED panels with FHD+ resolution here, which is a fine inclusion considering how Samsung has always been great with displays. Thanks to the slightly smaller display, the A52 is naturally ahead in terms of pixel density.

The bigger difference, however, would be the surprisingly higher refresh rate of 120 Hertz in the "smaller" model. This contrasts with the 90 Hertz refresh rate in the A72, which is perhaps not a complete disappointment for a smartphone in this price range, but I somehow get the feeling of being shortchanged since it is supposed to be the superior option to the A52. 

NextPit Samsung Galaxy A52 front camera
Too bad - you can't see the 120 Hz refresh rate that well in the picture, huh? / © NextPit

So if you value a particularly smooth display, the A52 should be the better option between the two. Perhaps the battery capacity will also be an interesting point of contention in this context: The larger A72 obviously carries a larger capacity 5,000 mAh battery compared to the 4,500 mAh battery in the smaller A52 5G. This difference is normally compensated by the different display sizes, so the battery life of both handsets should be on par.

However, if you now take into consideration the lower refresh rate in the A72, the 6.7-inch device should also score minimally better here. Let us remember that having your smartphone connected to a 5G network would also consume more power throughout the day, but with 5G networks not being popular worldwide at the moment, that is a moot point - for now.

By the way, both smartphones support fast charging at 25 watts. That is not earth-shattering compared to the rest of the competition, but at least it is significantly faster than the previous rating of 15 watts. You can also count on the fact that the slightly slower charging is healthier for the battery in the long run - a point that should be taken into consideration if you plan to use the smartphone for a longer time due to the guaranteed four-year security updates. As for the battery, it's a shame that both the A72 and A52 5G does not support wireless charging.

Conclusion: Who is the winner?

As we are on the home stretch of our comparison of Samsung's current mid-range champions, the good news up-front is that you basically can't go wrong with either model because both the Galaxy A52 5G and the A72 are two really decent smartphones.

Yes, of course they look pretty boring and lack that killer feature that will completely knock your socks off. But that's just what you have to live with when you pay "only" less than $500 instead of $1,200 for a high-end flagship that has all the bells and whistles in a stunning design.

samsung galaxy a52 hands on 2ct
A72 or A52 5G - which model do you prefer? / © Samsung

Both are priced between $400 and $500, and we can expect them to fall below the $400 mark in the not too distant future. However, the mid-range market is a really competitive sector with strong competition. Just think of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro for instance, which can now be purchased for less than $300.

However, if you want to buy one of these two highly recommended smartphones, you will have to take into consideration the minute differences and decide on what is more important to you. You get the better camera and longer battery life in the A72 - both features that I will personally pay more attention to when purchasing a smartphone when considering what the hardware specifications have to offer. 

On the other hand, if you really want to go for 5G support right now, especially in view of the longer term, then aim for the A52 5G. That will also net you the smoother 120 Hz display. Final question: Which device do you like more or has the stronger pull factor for you?

Take your pick: The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G or Galaxy A72?
View results


 The best smartphones under $400

  Editorial tip Price tip 3rd place 4th place 5th place
Image Google Pixel 6a Product Image Apple iPhone SE (2022) Product Image Samsung Galaxy A53 Product Image OnePlus Nord N20 Product Image Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Product Image
Review: Google Pixel 6a
Review: Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Review: Samsung Galaxy A53
Not yet tested
Not yet tested
Price (MSRP)
  • $449.00
  • $429.00
  • $449.99
  • $299.00
  • $399.00
Go to comment (0)
Carsten Drees

Carsten Drees
Senior Editor

I started blogging in 2008 and have written for Mobilegeeks, Stadt Bremerhaven, Basic Thinking and Dr. Windows. I've been at NextPit since 2021, where I also discovered my passion for podcasts. I have been particularly interested in Android phones for many years now, and would like to get involved with the highly exciting smart home market. LEt's see, did I miss anything else? Oh yes, I love Depeche Mode and suffer with Schalke 04.

To the author profile
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
No comments
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing