Hot topics

Google investigates: optical fingerprint readers may not be secure

oppo r17 press oppo 02
© Oppo

The race to produce the smartphone with the highest screen/surface ratio has led to an incredible leap forward for many of the technologies included in smartphones, including the various biometric unlocking systems. The new fingerprint readers integrated into the displays are certainly attractive but are they just as secure? Google seems to want to find out.

Fingerprint readers integrated into the displays are certainly one of the fashions of the moment. Producers far from our markets have been experimenting with technology for several generations now while in Europe we are just beginning to discover this innovation thanks to manufacturers such as OnePlus, Vivo and OPPO.

oppo r17 pro official

Many OPPO smartphones use fingerprint readers integrated into the display. / © Oppo

These fingerprint readers are better than the first models on the market but they all have one thing in common: they are based on optical technology. It seems that Google has some doubts about the security of this method of biometric unlocking and seems to be investigating the issue to decide whether to enable the use of these sensors in applications that require more security (home banking, payments from smartphones, etc. ...). David Ruddock, who posted the story that reached his ears during CES 2019, says so.

If Google were to find these sensors unsafe it could block the so-called "TrustZone" effectively preventing the use of this authentication system and forcing users to use the old PIN method. If these hypotheses prove to be true we could say goodbye to many of the smartphones with optical fingerprint readers integrated in the display, manufacturers would have to fall back on other types of technologies such as 3D scanners for the face and this would certainly slow down the spread of the futuristic feature.

However, there is another alternative: ultrasonic fingerprint readers. These sensors are more accurate and precise and represent a better solution, but they are also more expensive. The largest producer on the market at the moment is Qualcomm. It's no wonder that one of the biggest customers for this technology is Samsung, which intends to use it in its new flagship store, the Galaxy S10, which will certainly be anything but cheap.

porsche design huawei 04
Huawei has already used both optical and ultrasonic technology in the past. / © NextPit

Samsung is not, however, the first to use Qualcomm's ultrasonic sensors. The first smartphone to use this technology was the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design and I must admit that I was not surprised by the speed of recognition which is, albeit only slightly, slower than the classic fingerprint readers. We hope that the Galaxy S10 range will use improved technology...

Do you use biometrically recognized unlocks for convenience or do you rely on secure PINs at all times?

Source: Twitter

 The best smartphones under $400

  Editorial tip Price tip 3rd place 4th place 5th place
Image Google Pixel 6a Product Image Apple iPhone SE (2022) Product Image Samsung Galaxy A53 Product Image OnePlus Nord N20 Product Image Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Product Image
Review: Google Pixel 6a
Review: Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Review: Samsung Galaxy A53
Not yet tested
Not yet tested
Price (MSRP)
  • $449.00
  • $429.00
  • $449.99
  • $299.00
  • $399.00
Go to comment (4)
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing

  • 49
    storm Jan 16, 2019 Link to comment

    The Authenticator Rhyme, courtesy of Charles Stross:

    something shared,
    something do,
    something secret,
    something you

  • 28
    itprolonden Jan 15, 2019 Link to comment

    They're not if they're on Chinese phones! Apple will do it if it makes sense so we'll just have to wait.

  • Albin Foro 30
    Albin Foro Jan 15, 2019 Link to comment

    Won't give anything biometric to any of these corporate megalodons, won't even give my real name to Google. I'll take my chances with Joe Shmoe in the checkout row spying my changeable pattern with the phone in my grip, versus handing unalterable (short of surgery) ID voluntarily to known identity harvesters.

  • Rusty H. 33
    Rusty H. Jan 15, 2019 Link to comment

    I'd rather use that, than punch in my 4 digit code, which you know good and well EVERYONE had security cameras everywhere.

Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing