Hot topics

Why will Android Go succeed where Android One failed?

google io 2017 198
© Screenshots: nextpit

Android Go is yet another attempt by Google at creating a more fluid operating system for smartphones that contain less powerful hardware, and which are consequently cheaper. In 2014, Google launched Android One, which was intended for the same target audience - users of lower-end devices. So, having tried once already in the past, will Google be able to reach its goal this time?

During the Google I/O 2017 keynote presentation, Google's Vice President of product management, Sameer Samat, said that “every seven minutes, a Brazilian activates an Android device.” Samat was alluding to Android Go, a basic version of Android O, which aims to encourage the market for entry-level smartphones in Brazil and India, among other countries with a user base that tends to favor low-end devices. Thus, it will offer a user experience for basic models only.

For those who might not remember, in the 2014 Google I/O event, Sundar Pichai announced Android One, which targeted very cheaply manufactured smartphones and which had the goal of getting Android up to the two billion user mark. At the time, the idea was to provide manufacturers with a model that had a good quality standard design and software based on pure Android, which would cover the user’s more basic smartphone needs.

The fact that Android Go has now come out in 2017 is basically confirming that Android One didn’t pan out. This begs the question, why would Android Go work if Android One didn't? The difference between the speeches during the keynotes is pretty obvious to me. In 2014, Google was focused on acquiring more users, and it was talking about attaining “the second billion”. 

It all seemed very aggressive. What Google has done in 2017 is completely change their tune: now it is going to improve the user experience on smartphones with 512 MB or 1 GB of RAM.

google io 2017 195
Android Go wants to be an entry-level option. / © Screenshots: ANDROIDPIT

The reality is that Google, a division of Alphabet, still needs more users, but now it understands that standardized hardware doesn’t create competition and so it won’t appeal to manufacturers. Now Google has realized that what could work is leaving hardware construction to the manufacturers, however basic that may be, and instead offering its solution as a product consisting of software that can run on entry-level smartphones with basic specs.

It won’t just be a success for Google and manufacturers, but for the user as well. Perhaps you've also heard of YouTube Go? The service allows, above all, that users can download videos (when there’s Wi-Fi, of course) on their device to be watched offline whenever they want. But it also comes with different features, such as being able to choose the quality and size of the video and sharing content with other devices by Bluetooth. All of this improves streaming and uses up less data.

google io 2017 196
Optimized data usage helps users rein in their data plans. / © Screenshots: ANDROIDPIT

Imagine, if you will, that Android Go will do the same, but on a system level. Apps like Gboard, YouTube, Google Chrome and the Play Store will be streamlined to save power and data. I’m taking a wild guess with what I'm about to say, but it’s possible that the software will be so good that devices running Android Go will get their system updates first.

I think Android Go will work because it will offer a decent software experience to be combined with low-cost hardware. Above all, manufacturers can compete in different areas of the entry-level category. I just hope that they don’t all band together and level out the price above $150. That’s what we have Android for.

I’ve been writing about all things Android for a long time now and there’s nothing worse than seeing a user spend their hard earned salary on a smartphone that delivers a bad experience. Especially if this is the only platform available to connect to the rest of the world via the internet. That’s why I will welcome Android Go with open arms.

Do you think Android Go will work? What do you think of Android One? We'd love to know your thoughts in the comments below!

 The best smartphones under $400

  Editorial tip Price tip 3rd place 4th place 5th place
Product
Image Google Pixel 6a Product Image Apple iPhone SE (2022) Product Image Samsung Galaxy A53 Product Image OnePlus Nord N20 Product Image Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Product Image
Review
Review: Google Pixel 6a
Review: Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Review: Samsung Galaxy A53
Not yet tested
Not yet tested
Price (MSRP)
  • $449.00
  • $429.00
  • $449.99
  • $299.00
  • $399.00
Offer*
Go to comment (0)
Camila Rinaldi

Camila Rinaldi
Head of Editorial

With over 10 years of reviewing smartphones and wearables, I recently became addicted to smart home gadgets. Even though I dove into the Apple ecosystem two years back, Android remains as one of my passions. Previously editor-in-chief of AndroidPIT and Canaltech in Brazil, I now write for the US market. I love my records and I believe that the best way to get to know a place is through its food.

View all articles
Liked this article? Share now!
Recommended articles
Latest articles
Push notification Next article
No comments
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing
Write new comment:
All changes will be saved. No drafts are saved when editing