xmpp vs websocket Android instant messaging protocol

  • Replies:1
Vinay Abhinamyu
  • Forum posts: 5

Oct 16, 2023, 3:40:07 PM via Website

xmpp vs websocket instant messaging protocol

XMPP is suitable for instant messaging and presence information, often used in chat and IoT.

WebSocket is ideal for real-time web applications, enabling low-latency, bidirectional communication without a central server.

XMPP uses XML, while WebSocket messages are binary or text. XMPP offers presence features, while WebSocket requires additional security mechanisms for authentication. The choice depends on the specific needs of your application, with XMPP for chat and presence and WebSocket for real-time web applications.
They can also be used in combination to achieve both presence management and real-time communication.

Fatima Ansari
  • Forum posts: 21

Oct 26, 2023, 9:19:24 PM via Website

XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) and WebSockets are two different technologies that can be used for instant messaging in Android applications. They have their own strengths and use cases, so let's compare them:

XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol):

Standardized Protocol: XMPP is an open and standardized protocol specifically designed for real-time messaging and presence information. It has been widely used in instant messaging applications.

Presence Information: XMPP is not just for sending messages; it also provides presence information, allowing you to see when a user is online, offline, or away.

Extensible: As the "X" in XMPP suggests, it's highly extensible. You can add custom extensions to support various features and services.

Server-Based: XMPP typically relies on a server to manage connections and message routing. This can be a pro or a con depending on your use case.

Interoperability: XMPP is supported by a variety of platforms and clients, which can facilitate cross-platform messaging.


Low Latency: WebSockets provide a full-duplex, bidirectional communication channel over a single, long-lived connection. This reduces latency and is ideal for real-time applications.

Web-Based: WebSockets are well-suited for web-based applications and can easily be integrated into web browsers. They are also suitable for native Android apps.

Simplicity: WebSockets are relatively simple to implement and do not require as much overhead as some other protocols.

No Need for a Dedicated Server: Unlike XMPP, WebSockets can operate without a dedicated server (although a server can be used for certain features).

Customization: While WebSockets provide a low-level communication channel, they can be used as a foundation for building custom messaging protocols to meet your application's specific needs.

The choice between XMPP and WebSockets depends on your specific requirements. If you need a full-fledged messaging protocol with presence information, XMPP may be a better choice. If low-latency communication, simplicity, and the ability to build a custom protocol are your priorities, WebSockets can be a strong contender.

It's also worth noting that modern instant messaging platforms often use a combination of technologies. For example, they may use WebSockets for real-time communication and XMPP for presence and messaging routing. The choice can be influenced by the specific features and performance characteristics you need for your Android instant messaging application.